Register new account
Edit account
Search

Ancient Domains Of Mystery, forum overview / General / Dark Vs Light

Online users ( Unknown)
Application object not working properly at the moment, no clue who is online...

* Numbers in parentheses are the number of minutes since the user last loaded a page. Logged-in users time out after 40 minutes (unless they manually log out), lurkers and anonymous posters after 20.

This thread is 2 pages long.
Go to page 1 2
Sengoku
Registered user

Last page view:

8141 days, 27 minutes and 38 seconds ago.
Posted on Thursday, June 21, 2001 at 05:32 (GMT -5)

I'm interested in peoples alignment and style.
Would you say it was better to join the dark side or the light side?
Or in Adom terms would you prefer to become a Chaos god or a Avatar of Law? (not accounting for difficulty.)
Oh and don't forget Balance too, I almost forgot.

I'd go for Light!


Sengoku
Portrait
Palagran
Registered user
Furry Hybrid


Last page view:

6572 days, 7 hours, 41 minutes and 17 seconds ago.
Posted on Thursday, June 21, 2001 at 16:09 (GMT -5)

I believe very strongly in Balance.
Ade
Unregistered user
Posted on Friday, June 22, 2001 at 18:13 (GMT -5)

I believe in chaos :) That's what we all are - chaos, plain chaos. I wouldn't call it evil, just chaotic. Damn, I'm not sober enough to explain more ;)
Portrait
Palagran
Registered user
Furry Hybrid


Last page view:

6572 days, 7 hours, 41 minutes and 17 seconds ago.
Posted on Friday, June 22, 2001 at 19:54 (GMT -5)

Haha.
Aristotle
Registered user

Last page view:

8504 days, 2 hours, 23 minutes and 1 second ago.
Posted on Saturday, June 23, 2001 at 13:21 (GMT -5)

In this life we walk a very narrow tightrope between light and dark. However, I'm all for the dark side! Sorry Sengoku :)


Be straight with people.
Portrait
Palagran
Registered user
Furry Hybrid


Last page view:

6572 days, 7 hours, 41 minutes and 17 seconds ago.
Posted on Saturday, June 23, 2001 at 22:36 (GMT -5)

Aristotle, I think many chaotics would be a bit less polite than that. *Grin*
Aristotle
Registered user

Last page view:

8504 days, 2 hours, 23 minutes and 1 second ago.
Posted on Sunday, June 24, 2001 at 11:56 (GMT -5)

I know, I think I need a litle more practice!


Be straight with people.
Portrait
Kyp Durron
Registered user

Last page view:

8541 days, 3 hours, 8 minutes and 12 seconds ago.
Posted on Monday, June 25, 2001 at 08:54 (GMT -5)

I'd go for balance too Palagran. Being too light sided can entail an annoying judgemental side and lack of acceptance for others.



Kyp Durron
Aristotle
Registered user

Last page view:

8504 days, 2 hours, 23 minutes and 1 second ago.
Posted on Monday, June 25, 2001 at 15:27 (GMT -5)

Sometimes light is dark and dark is light.


Be straight with people.
Portrait
Palagran
Registered user
Furry Hybrid


Last page view:

6572 days, 7 hours, 41 minutes and 17 seconds ago.
Posted on Monday, June 25, 2001 at 16:10 (GMT -5)

Dark is the absence of light.
Sengoku
Registered user

Last page view:

8141 days, 27 minutes and 38 seconds ago.
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2001 at 07:08 (GMT -5)

But darkness would not exist without light as they both define each other through comparsion right? Light needs darkness and darkness needs light.
I don't think people nowadays can follow direct alignments though, I mean goths and vampires kind of worship darkness but they're really pleasent and polite people to talk to.
Can anyone actually define what light, balance and darkness is all about? I have my beliefs but I'm just wondering what the rest of you think.



Sengoku
Caladriel
Registered user
ReGiStErEd UsEr


Last page view:

4908 days, 20 minutes and 16 seconds ago.
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2001 at 10:09 (GMT -5)

Vampires easy to talk to? I guess so, if you can put up with all the lisping and the pretensious accents.
Portrait
Palagran
Registered user
Furry Hybrid


Last page view:

6572 days, 7 hours, 41 minutes and 17 seconds ago.
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2001 at 15:47 (GMT -5)

I was referring to physical light, not the alignment. :)
NaZgul
Registered user

Last page view:

7943 days, 8 hours, 23 minutes and 40 seconds ago.
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2001 at 03:03 (GMT -5)

I always prefered Balance. And twilight..

Sengoku
Registered user

Last page view:

8141 days, 27 minutes and 38 seconds ago.
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2001 at 15:35 (GMT -5)

Palagran, none of us people are on about light and dark in your sense, I don't think so at least.
Caladriel, the ones I've spoken too aren't like that.
Nazgul, what do you mean by twilight?
Anyone thought of any definitions yet?


Sengoku
Portrait
Palagran
Registered user
Furry Hybrid


Last page view:

6572 days, 7 hours, 41 minutes and 17 seconds ago.
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2001 at 19:08 (GMT -5)

I know, I know. ^_^

I have some definitions in my mind, but I tend to get long-winded about stuff like that. Maybe it's best to let each person decide for him/herself.
NaZgul
Registered user

Last page view:

7943 days, 8 hours, 23 minutes and 40 seconds ago.
Posted on Saturday, June 30, 2001 at 06:03 (GMT -5)

Twilight are between day and night, between Light and Darkness.
Locke
Registered user
Treasure hunter


Last page view:

8109 days, 13 hours, 24 minutes and 31 seconds ago.
Posted on Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 13:25 (GMT -5)

A person can never be true evil or true good. Just thought I'd put some more fuel on this discussion. :)


Locke Cole
fgn
Registered user

Last page view:

8283 days, 7 hours, 50 minutes and 30 seconds ago.
Posted on Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 14:14 (GMT -5)

Being chaotic is, in my opinion , very easy. And being lawful is harder. So I prefer being lawful :)


"wlazł kotek na płotek spadł na pysk
złamał se dwa żebra wypadł mu dysk"
Portrait
Ade
Registered user
Being perverse is bad


Last page view:

7918 days, 1 hour, 22 minutes and 12 seconds ago.
Posted on Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 14:34 (GMT -5)

Chaos and law are just artificial concepts... created by minds of human beings, so these concepts cannot be more complicated than our minds. That means that it's impossible to define whether one could be marked as 'chaotic' or 'lawful'.


You make my life and times
A book of bluesy saturdays
fgn
Registered user

Last page view:

8283 days, 7 hours, 50 minutes and 30 seconds ago.
Posted on Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 15:00 (GMT -5)

mabe that's not true, but when someone is lawful, he does "good" acts, and when someone is chaotic, he does "bad" acts.

But that's isn't a good definition, 'coz everyone think different about which acts are good, and which ones are bad.


"wlazł kotek na płotek spadł na pysk
złamał se dwa żebra wypadł mu dysk"
Portrait
Jan Erik
Administrator

Last page view:

9 days, 4 hours, 13 minutes and 46 seconds ago.
Posted on Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 21:18 (GMT -5)

Lawfull and Chaotic is not the same as Good and Evil.

If you are lawfull you simply follow the rules/laws/norms of your society. This is different from society to society.

It is quite possible to be (to use an AD&D alignment designation) Chaotic Good, or Lawfull Evil.

If you for example steal a car and speed to the hospital to save a wounded person you are doing a Chaotic act, breaking the law. But you do it with good intent. That is a typical example of a Chaotic Good person, do waht you think to be the right thing to do, and to hell with the rules (you may try to smooth things over afterwards, but there and then you don't let the fact that the only means of transportation is locked and the owner is nowhere in sight stop you).

On the other hand a lawyer who use loopholes and tecnicalities to get a client he know to be gulty out of jail might be very lawfull (folow the book to the letter so to speak), but doing so is not exactly something most people would consider good.


Jan Erik Mydland
HoF admin
fgn
Registered user

Last page view:

8283 days, 7 hours, 50 minutes and 30 seconds ago.
Posted on Friday, July 13, 2001 at 14:36 (GMT -5)

I think that's different for every people. Everyone has a different kind of thinking...
(I dont' know if you understand me)


"wlazł kotek na płotek spadł na pysk
złamał se dwa żebra wypadł mu dysk"
Locke
Registered user
Treasure hunter


Last page view:

8109 days, 13 hours, 24 minutes and 31 seconds ago.
Posted on Saturday, July 14, 2001 at 08:23 (GMT -5)

We all have a different definitions of evil, neutral and lawful. That's why there's no such thing as true evil, neutral or lawful, IMO.


Locke Cole
Stas
Registered user
The Dark Lord Melkor


Last page view:

7862 days, 2 hours, 3 minutes and 32 seconds ago.
Posted on Sunday, July 22, 2001 at 08:55 (GMT -5)

our images of E, N and L are changing all the time...
"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger"
Lord of The Rings

"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will anger the cat lord"

Dezertir
Unregistered user
Posted on Monday, July 23, 2001 at 09:23 (GMT -5)

Of neutrality.

No one mortal can be absolutely *good* or *light* because only God (call Him any name) is the absolute.
Also, no one can be absolutely *evil* or *dark* because a contrast of Absolut is literally nothing (not even chaos but void).

In the world of Ancardia (see Myth of Creation in ADOM.DE) they said Order and Chaos both are results of dreams/nightmares of Gaethra (f#@$ng Buddhism :-)). So, no principal differences. And see: how Chaos can be absoutely evil if it is creature of Creator's idea?

In my humbling opinion, the right alignment is N. You are off extremal sides, you can use positives of both (because all being has positive sides - all is created by God and nothing can be without Him). But you stay free from blind service to white and black banners of *this* world. See: wild beasts are N, and druids - priests of nature.
Neutrality is not *gray* but *rainbow*-colored conception!
Locke
Registered user
Treasure hunter


Last page view:

8109 days, 13 hours, 24 minutes and 31 seconds ago.
Posted on Monday, July 23, 2001 at 18:45 (GMT -5)

Well, gray is produced by mixing black and white... And since white contains all colors... *shrugs* I am a lil off topic I 'spose. Just felt like adding a side note that's all. :)


Locke Cole
Prickle Pear
Unregistered user
Posted on Saturday, November 02, 2002 at 21:49 (GMT -5)

Neutrality is both good & evil, I'd go for neutrality don't have to rob banks, but you don't have to save everyone

Unregistered user
Posted on Monday, November 04, 2002 at 16:53 (GMT -5)

In more D&Dish terms, chaotic good.
feilos
Unregistered user
Posted on Monday, November 04, 2002 at 21:36 (GMT -5)

Jan glad you cleared up the asumption of good vs. evil/Chaotic and Lawful thingy...
In ADOM you meet plenty of lawful people, as for the chaotics, I find that there is only a sight chance of them being non-hostile. My stand...neutral, cuz you don't last long at the beginning; bashing on farmers and townfolk.
Go to page 1 2

Color mixer:
Red: Green: Blue: HTML color code: result:      
Your Name: Check to login:

Your Message:


Read the
formating help
Are you a spambot? Yes No Maybe Huh?
Create poll? Yes No   What is this?
Poll question: